There is no 'edge' to our Universe; even if you were able to somehow able to travel faster than light, and go beyond our observable universe, you would never encounter an edge, no matter how far you looked.

Likewise, the Earth is finite in size, but there is no edge to the Earth; it's a curved surface. Mathematicians would call this a 2-dimensional surface of positive curvature, embedded in 3 dimensions---you can travel around the earth, and eventually end up where you start.

 The universe works the same way, except that it is a three-dimensional curved surface embedded in four (spatial) dimensions. Just like we can't find the center of the Earth anywhere on its surface, there is no center to the Universe that we can find, because we are stuck on its 3-dimensional surface; the center is in a higher dimension

  the fourth spatial dimension is that we can't observe because it is OUTSIDE OUR 3-D Universe, it is beyond what current science can answer

  time travel is fifth dimension,

many things  are beyond what current science can answer

still egoist man thinks a theory is greater than what is unknown

if a theory is .0000001 % the unknown is the rest

dont come to conclusions; on just the thoughts and theories  of 19th  century 


Recently it has been observed that the farthest objects we can see are not only traveling outwards at great speed but also accelerating. (It is my personal belief that) God gave the galaxies their initial thrust but to be accelerating there must be some other force being exerted too. One feasible explanation is that there are similar bodies near enough to pull the outer regions of our Universe outwards


 Einstein theorized that it is possible that there are two universe, connected by a wormhole.

Others say that the 'big bang' that created us was a 'splat' from another, older, parallel universe that was having a violent episode. The material from that 'splat' surged into emptiness, so much so that it created an alternate continuum, and then exploded as a huge white hole, creating our universe. They also say it's been expanding since then.

 Some experts, as Steven Hawking, believe that all the matter in the universe was at one time compacted into something small, the size of a marble maybe. It was incredibly massive or perhaps more accurately, incredibly energetic.

It is currently believed that there were no actual physical particles present. It had an explosive reaction to something, and bang--hello universe.

can we call that something as a creative energy or creator?

 The universe, according to Einstein, is circular. All of space and matter is observably distorted or warped by gravitational fields, and all of the universe is encompassed in one gigantic gravitational field. If the universe is indeed closed, then if you traveled in any direction in a straight line you would (assuming you didn't run into a planet or black hole or something) eventually come back to the same exact spot. This concept is the basis for the hoaky but interesting movie "the paycheck" with Ben Affleck.

  • According to the newly emerging "Membrane" Theory, or Brane Theory, the universe as we know it is really a membrane, or flexible bumpy plane (or so it would seem to the quantum elves who can see things in the 11 dimensions theorized to be necessary for certain things to occur). Our membrane is one of perhaps countless membranes. They are all around us, everywhere. "Closer to us than our skin", as one physicist remarks. When 2 membranes collide, the result is... a new universe. Black holes may be evidence that such a collision has happened.

 We all know about the big bang theory that suggests that space-time was created between 10 and 20 billions of years ago
-who created?not darwin for sure 

 space-time is absent outside the universe since the big-bang didn't create the 'area' outside our universe. However, we can't conclude that there is nothing there. So, we can say that there is something other than space-time present

it can be called  "a new heaven and a new earth",where  space-time is absent

We are so locked in to our amazingly tiny view of the universe relative to both space and time that we are surely not yet open to some Very Big Ideas
 



No comments:

Post a Comment